The figure below displays all conservation gap analysis scores per Vitis taxon, with ex situ conservation scores shown as circles, in situ conservation scores shown as triangles, and the combined (FCSc-mean) score as a diamond. The scores are used to categorize taxa, with urgent priority (UP) for further conservation action assigned when score < 25, high priority (HP) where 25 ≤ score < 50, medium priority (MP) where 50 ≤ score < 75, and low priority (LP) for taxa whose score ≥75. Hover over features to see the scores. Click the objects at the bottom of the figures to turn on and off elements on the figure.
The table below displays conservation gap analysis results per assessed taxon. Results of the conservation assessments within each conservation format [Sampling Representativeness Score ex situ (SRS ex situ), Geographic Representativeness Score ex situ (GRS ex situ), and Ecological Representativeness Score ex situ (ERS ex situ) for ex situ; and Sampling Representativeness Score in situ (SRS in situ), Geographic Representativeness Score in situ (GRS in situ) and Ecological Representativeness Score in situ (ERS in situ) for in situ] are displayed. The Combined Final Conservation Score (FCSc-mean) is the average of the final ex situ (FCS ex situ) and in situ (FCS in situ) scores. The scores are used to categorize taxa, with urgent priority (UP) for further conservation action assigned when score < 25, high priority (HP) where 25 ≤ score < 50, medium priority (MP) where 50 ≤ score < 75, and low priority (LP) for taxa whose score ≥75.
All germplasm records utilized in the ex situ conservation assessments can be found within the Supplementary Material associated with the publication or through this link
Displayed maps, projected at 2.5 arc minutes resolution here, may not precisely reflect conservation gap analysis scores, which were based on maps at 30 arc seconds resolution.
The figure above displays the predicted taxonomic richness map for the assessed taxa, combining 36 potential distribution models. Darker colors indicate greater numbers of taxa potentially overlapping in the same areas.
The figure above displays predicted collecting priority hotspots to
resolve geographic gaps in current ex situ conservation. The
map displays richness of geographic areas within the potential
distributions of the assessed taxa that have not been previously
collected for ex situ conservation (i.e., areas not within 50
km of an existing germplasm collection location). Darker colors indicate
greater numbers of taxa potentially overlapping in the same areas.
The figure above displays predicted collecting priority hotspots to resolve ecological gaps in current ex situ conservation. The map displays richness of ecoregions within the potential distributions of the assessed taxa that have not been previously collected for ex situ conservation. Darker colors indicate greater numbers of taxa potentially overlapping in the same areas.